Private Equity and Healthcare: Balancing Profit with Wellness
March 2026
Private equity firms have invested more than $1 trillion in debt-financed healthcare deals over the last decade—often at the expense of patient care.
When private equity enters healthcare, the financial pressure it creates is rarely neutral. PE-owned companies maintain debt-to-cash flow ratios more than double those of public healthcare companies, leading to staff reductions, hospital closures, and compromised care. According to some of the most disturbing studies, PE ownership raises in-hospital complications by 25%, reduces hospital staff by 11.6%, and correlates with 11% higher patient mortality rates in nursing homes.
At the heart of this report is a series of case studies documenting how financial engineering plays out in the real world—across PE-owned hospitals, nursing homes, behavioral health facilities, ambulance and medical staffing firms, wheelchair and ventilator makers, providers of sign language services, prison health providers and homes for troubled youth. These cases reveal a consistent pattern: debt accumulation, sale-leaseback transactions, and cost-cutting that ultimately harms patients and communities.
This report does not call for the elimination of private equity in healthcare. Some PE firms have adopted responsible practices and do provide capital and operational expertise. But the scale of harm documented here demands reform—and this report proposes concrete recommendations for PE investors and state and federal governments to prioritize patient care over profit.
KEY RECOMMENDATIONS
- Make full and ongoing public disclosures regarding your healthcare firms’ finances—including the private debt on their balance sheets—as well as their owners, employees, patient outcomes, customer satisfaction, and other service quality metrics.
- Refrain from sale-leaseback transactions or debt-funded dividends. Don’t load your healthcare firms with new obligations, whether to service debt or to pay rent on property they previously owned, leaving them vulnerable to cyclical dips in revenue.
- Maintain a maximum ratio of debt to cash flow that is appropriate to the subsector, with the ratio determined in consultation with a range of subsector experts.
- Refrain from cutting essential health services, closing health facilities, reducing staff, or reducing wages, except in exigent circumstances subject to regulatory approval.
- State legislatures should empower state health regulators to block or condition the acquisition of any healthcare business, based on broad public interest criteria—preserving the availability, accessibility, affordability, and quality of care.
Values-Based InvestingRelated
See all
Conscience Incorporated
In his new book Conscience Incorporated, Michael Posner, director of the Center for Business and Human Rights, offers practical strategies and bold reforms to help businesses align profitability with ethical responsibility.
Reimagining Shareholder Advocacy on Environmental and Social Issues: The promise and pitfalls of ‘E&S stewardship’
Our most recent report on ESG written by Michael Goldhaber, highlights how shareholder advocacy ought to focus on achieving real-world impact for the environment and society, rather than settling for low-bar goals or non-binding promises.
Knight Diversity of Asset Managers Research Series: Higher Education 2024
A new paper by the NYU Stern Center for Business and Human Rights, Knight Foundation, and Global Economics Group examines how or if 50 of the wealthiest U.S. colleges and universities invest their endowment funds with diverse-owned asset management firms.