Regulating Social Media: The Fight Over Section 230 — And Beyond
September 2020
Who is liable for online content?
There are increasing calls to curtail or revoke Section 230, a 1996 law that protects internet companies from most lawsuits related to user-generated content. Critics of Section 230 say it discourages vigilant self-regulation. Proponents counter that the law has fostered free expression and innovation. Our report concludes that Section 230 ought to be preserved but significantly amended.
Creating a new internet regulator
Reform in this area should go beyond amending Section 230. We recommend formation of a Digital Regulatory Agency— an independent body with internet expertise that will establish and enforce rules aimed at boosting platform transparency and accountability without interfering in content decisions. The agency could, for example, require internet companies to disclose how their algorithms order news feeds and recommendations, which would help explain how harmful content spreads.
Technology & DemocracyRelated
See all
Conscience Incorporated
In his new book Conscience Incorporated, Michael Posner, director of the Center for Business and Human Rights, offers practical strategies and bold reforms to help businesses align profitability with ethical responsibility.
Setting Higher Standards: How Governments Can Regulate Corporate Human Rights Performance
Our report, released three months after the landmark CSDDD entered into force, provides a roadmap for regulators and companies navigating a new era of corporate human rights responsibility.
Covert Campaigns: Safeguarding Encrypted Messaging Platforms from Voter Manipulation
Our new report on encrypted messaging platforms reveals how political propagandists are exploiting these tools to manipulate voters globally, while offering recommendations for platforms, policymakers, and researchers to mitigate these threats without undermining end-to-end encryption.