Regulating Social Media: The Fight Over Section 230 — And Beyond
September 2020
Who is liable for online content?
There are increasing calls to curtail or revoke Section 230, a 1996 law that protects internet companies from most lawsuits related to user-generated content. Critics of Section 230 say it discourages vigilant self-regulation. Proponents counter that the law has fostered free expression and innovation. Our report concludes that Section 230 ought to be preserved but significantly amended.
Creating a new internet regulator
Reform in this area should go beyond amending Section 230. We recommend formation of a Digital Regulatory Agency— an independent body with internet expertise that will establish and enforce rules aimed at boosting platform transparency and accountability without interfering in content decisions. The agency could, for example, require internet companies to disclose how their algorithms order news feeds and recommendations, which would help explain how harmful content spreads.
Technology & DemocracyRelated
See all
Trust, Play, and Platforms: Sharing Lessons for Safer Digital Spaces
Drawing on expert reflections from a September 2025 symposium, this paper examines how Trust & Safety governance in online gaming compares to social media and what the games industry's unique experience with community-driven moderation can teach policymakers and advocates working across all digital spaces.
Submission to the French Council on Artificial Intelligence and Digital Affairs
The Working Group on Gaming and Regulation filed a submission with the French Council on AI and Digital Affairs, responding to a mission assessing the potential risks of video games for minors.
Digital Aftershocks: Online Mobilization and Violence in the United States
Our new report draws on open-source intelligence to trace how extremist actors coordinate across online platforms to justify violence and recruit supporters, offering a framework for policy and platform response.